Other places: Beckett’s TV work, a “new” Churchill play, Brecht’s Galileo in Stratford-upon-Avon

Jack McGowran in a BBC production of Samuel Beckett's Eh Joe.

Jack McGowran in a BBC production of Samuel Beckett’s Eh Joe.

From Rhys Tranter of A Piece of Monologue comes a pointer to this essay by Jonathan Bignell about Samuel Beckett‘s television plays. As might be expected, Bignell writes, these were not exactly ratings blockbusters:

The BBC Audience Research Report on Eh Joe shows that 3% of the viewers in the BBC’s audience sample watched the play, and the Reaction Index for the programme (a measure of appreciation) was the low figure of 49. Several viewers liked the use of monologue over silent images, and one viewer wrote “obviously television could be the medium for this sort of thing, and it is a good experiment.”  But many viewers thought the play was very depressing.  A third of the sample said it was dull and dreary, with no visual appeal. …

In Britain there has always been a tension between television’s Public Service responsibility to raise the cultural standards of audiences, and the requirement to entertain. Broadcasts of Beckett’s television work show that the BBC could ignore negative audience responses and small numbers of viewers and present “the best” of arts culture as defined by BBC personnel and an informed reviewing culture in the press. The casting of high-profile theatre actors in Beckett’s television work, and the images of art-works by Bacon and Giacometti in Shades, for example, link Beckett’s plays to a valued European (and not just British) arts culture.

New Caryl Churchill plays only come every few years, so it’s a bit of a surprise to find yet another Churchill world premiere just after last year’s Love and Information at the Royal Court. Ah — a world premiere, yes, but the world premiere of a play written some forty years ago. Her 1972 The Hospital at the Time of the Revolution begins performances at London’s Finborough Theatre on 31 March. Set in Algeria in 1956, the play is described thusly:

A civil servant presents his psychologically disturbed daughter to the hospital for assessment and insists on her admittance. An inspector demands treatment for his helpless violence against his own wife and child. Three in-patient revolutionaries are delusional and paranoid. These products of a broken society are beginning to show symptoms, how should they be treated? The Hospital at the Time of the Revolution is a forensic insight into the adjustment of morality for the sake of conscience.

Bertolt Brecht is busting out all over. We’ve got the disastrously received Clive (an adaptation of Baal) and the rather more highly-regarded Good Person of Szechwan here in New York; now Mark Ravenhill’s adaptation A Life of Galileo is at the RSC in Stratford-upon-Avon. (Galileo was born on this day, 15 February, in 1564; don’t forget to send a card.) Michael Billington lauded the show in the Guardian this past Wednesday:

A reactionary pope dies, only to be succeeded by a seeming liberal who soon reverts to institutional conservatism. You could hardly have a more topical play than this. But the real pleasure of Roxana Silbert’s modern-dress RSC revival and Mark Ravenhill’s slimmed-down translation lies in the absolute clarity with which they put Brecht’s masterpiece before us. …  [The] real joy lies in seeing Brecht’s timeless debate about scientific morality rendered with such pellucid swiftness.

Brecht appears to be back, even if he never really left us. And thanks to Mr. Billington or whoever decides these things for the link to my own essay on Life of Galileo from his review.

Below, the trailer for the current RSC production of Life of Galileo for your viewing pleasure:

Other places: The tears of a critic

tissues

You may be forgiven for mistaking the next meeting of the New York Drama Critics’ Circle for a maternity ward; this week brought a slew of contenders tripping over their Kleenex boxes for a shot at the Most Lachrymose Reviewer honor. Yesterday, Ben Brantley in a think-piece for the New York Times admitted, “When the big party moment came around in The Suit, I still had tear tracks on my face from earlier scenes” — maybe his essay could be more accurately described as a “feel-piece.” Also yesterday, the New Yorker‘s Hilton Als described himself as overcome with tears at a press performance of Good Person of Szechwan: “We cry with Shen Tei because Taylor Mac will not let her faith go,” he says. Come, come, Mr. Als — I saw that show too. Stiff upper lip and all that; it’s a very good, imperfect production of a minor Brecht play, not the Resurrection of Our Lord. And today, reviewing a Florida production of A Raisin in the Sun, Terry Teachout writes, “If you’d been at last Saturday’s matinee, you would also have heard weeping throughout the auditorium during the final scene of this glorious revival. Never have tears been so honestly earned.” I fear that Mr. Teachout may have disqualified himself here by reporting on the audience’s tears rather than his own.

All this, just in the first week of February — if this keeps up, it’ll be a long, wet year on the Rialto. Audiences are herewith advised to be on their guard: they don’t want to slip in the pool of tears collecting next to the aisle seat. Apparently British critics are made of sterner stuff: when the Guardian‘s Lyn Gardner goes to the theatre these days, she’s usually just bored.

A few other notes from around the Web this week:

HowlRound, the Web site for Emerson’s Center for the Theatre Commons, is accepting applications for critics who will emphasize “positive inquiry and rigorous thinking” in their writing. Thomas Garvey is skeptical.

The new issue of American Theatre magazine features Christopher Wallenberg’s extensive profile of playwright Christopher Shinn as Shinn’s new play Teddy Ferrara opens at Chicago’s Goodman Theatre.

After a lengthy hiatus, theatre blogging veteran Garrett Eisler returns to The Playgoer. Mr. Eisler says that, at least for now, he will be posting reviews every week or so; he begins with this evaluation of Broadway’s Cat on a Hot Tin Roof. All I can suggest is that he lay in a generous supply of Puffs.

Other places

Home page at Guerrilla Semiotics.

Home page at Guerrilla Semiotics.

It’s Old Home Week in the comments section of my post “Theatre blogosphere dead; no services planned” from Tuesday (which, curiously, garnered even more page views than Monday’s post, the previous champion). A few others have appropriately longer-form responses, the most thoughtful of these being Jana Perkovic’s essay at her blog Guerrilla Semiotics. She takes a long view of the ways that the critical blogosphere affected theatre in Melbourne; she writes:

As long as criticism is understood as a practice external to the the arts, critics will be subjected to the same precarious work conditions, same reliance (for both income and professional standards) on a completely extraneous industry, and the critical output of the country will remain of low volume, and abysmal quality. And, as long as writing criticism is seen as hurting one’s standing within the arts industry, the ability of criticism to attract the most educated, insightful, and articulate voices will be further compromised. Theatre criticism in a country cannot function entirely as a kamikaze operation.

The future of criticism is almost certainly not in full-time employment, and very definitely not in writing for newspapers and magazines. It is also not in microblogging, not on Twitter, not in “vox populi”-style surveys, and definitely not in different aggregators and miscellaneous arts portals that have sprung up in recent years, combining advertising revenue with no writers’ fees, and producing criticism no longer or better than the average newspaper. Criticism requires long form, a critical culture requires dialogue. …

The only credible future vision we have right now is of quality criticism as a sometimes-job or part-time job, done by people who receive the majority of their income somewhere else, people not writing criticism for the glory and influence (a la Kenneth Tynan), but out of a sense of responsibility towards the theatre sector, and out of writerly joy. If it exists, it will be funded by a patchwork of different sources, public and private — or it will continue to be funded by self-exploitation.

That’s from the conclusion of the essay, and it’s important to see how Ms. Perkovic gets there from its beginning. You can read the whole post here.

In the meantime, Aleks Sierz (The Theatre of Martin Crimp) recently interviewed the author of In the Republic of Happiness, Crimp’s new play at the Royal Court, in “Martin Crimp in the Republic of Satire” for the Arts Desk. Sierz’s review of the show, published just this morning, is here.

American Theatre debut

Mine, in the December 2012 issue of TCG’s American Theatre magazine, that is, where I review two new books about the British playwright Harold Pinter. It is not online, I am afraid (pony up for a subscription, why don’t you?), but you will find on the Web Alexis Soloski’s extended interview with Public Theater head honcho Oskar Eustis, and Robert Hedley and Harriet Powers’ comparison of the new play environments in the US and in Great Britain. I’m proud and delighted to make my American Theatre bow.

Other places

A few blogospheric notes to round out the summer:

Guardian critic Lyn Gardner is taking over the reins of that newspaper’s theatre blog as her “permanent home,” Andrew Dickson wrote on 6 August. Many writers, including myself, have contributed to the blog since its inception four years ago, and it is heartening to see the Guardian recognize it as an important venue for criticism by assigning one of its most important critics as its primary representative. Others will continue to contribute to it, but the focus has shifted: “[The] idea is that Lyn has more freedom to own the blog, to experiment with what the space can be (you’ll probably see shorter, more reactive posts and open threads), to get artists more involved, and to engage readers — yep, that’s you — in lots of different ways. We’re excited to see what happens. We hope it’ll keep evolving,” Dickson notes. I hope so too. In the meantime, congratulations to her as she assumes her new post.

Congratulations also to Feminist Spectator writer and Nathan-award winner Jill Dolan. Palgrave Macmillan is preparing The Feminist Spectator in Action:  Feminist Criticism for Stage and Screen, an anthology of Dolan’s blog posts, as well as a selection of new material, for publication in Spring 2013 — again, formal recognition of the maturity of the blogosphere as a place for long-form discussion of issues dramatic and theatrical. (After all, nobody’s exactly collecting Twitter or Facebook posts about theatre for print publication.) In the meantime, a new edition of her 1988 book The Feminist Spectator as Critic will be issued by the University of Michigan Press later this year.

Howard Sherman has been running some numbers, and his recent post “The Broadway Scorecard: Two Decades of Drama” provides a few surprising insights into the health of the non-musical play on Broadway over the past twenty years. The Great White Way has come in for its share of blame for its purported marginalization of new American plays, but Sherman’s study offers some evidence that this is not entirely true. He carefully parses the roles of both commercial and non-commercial producers of these plays on Broadway and concludes, “[So] long as Broadway remains a beacon for tourists, for theatre buffs and for the mainstream media, so long as it holds a fabled spot in the national and international imagination, plays on Broadway remain important, even if they are marginalized or unrepresentative. With all of the challenges that face producers, commercial or not-for-profit, who wish to mount plays, the public perception of American drama is still weighted towards Broadway, even if its mix of new plays and classics is but the tip of the iceberg, financially and creatively.”

Finally, Emily Rapp, who has been writing about her experience with her son Ronan at  Little Seal as well as in the New York Times and Slate, has announced that her book about Ronan, The Still Point of the Turning World, to be published by Penguin next March, is now available for pre-order at amazon.com. A few earlier posts about this are here and here. I highly recommend both her blog and the new book.